![]() That argument is just not very compelling. And while the two programs are widely used by the photographic community, they each serve a unique purpose and feature essential differences. So, choose between LR over PS - maybe for workflow efficiency - but not because of "destructive vs non-destructive". Adobe Lightroom Classic and Adobe Photoshop are both powerful editing programs, but determining which to use whether you’re a beginner, an enthusiast, or even a professional can be tough. Oh, but you say, you're using up a lot of space! That may have mattered in the past, but in today's world of cheap terabyte drives and limitless clouds, it really doesn't matter. Then, no way, now how, will your original be messed with. This is always good practice at the beginning of your workflow. Also, if you hit SAVE AS, then you will make a different file from the original, in a subfolder to the original's folder called, say, New. ![]() OK, there may be cached RAM somewhere in your sys files, but that's not relevant to this discussion.) For TIFFs, BMPs, RAW and other non-lossy files, you can SAVE them, then say, Oops, go to the top of the History pane, which always retains your opening step, even if you've "run out" of History steps, hit SAVE, and get your original back completely intact. ![]() Again, you are just copying the original to RAM, then closing the RAM "file," which goes out of existence. (This does not apply to just viewing the file image. Now, for a JPEG, that SAVE will be destructive, because JPEG uses "lossy" compression that loses data whenever the file is compressed and/or recompressed, which happens when you open the file then recompress it when saving it again. It is only when you hit SAVE that the original will be changed - the RAM copy will overwrite the original. You can mess around all you want with the RAM copy, and the original will remain untouched. It is with the RAM copy you are working, not the original. You are copying it from your storage medium - hard drive, USB drive, cloud - to local RAM. Here's why: When you open a file in PS, like in LR, you are not touching the original. That's fine, but as a PS user I find destructive vs non-destructive meaningless in practice. Met Adobe Photoshop Lightroom kunnen fotografen professionals en hobbyisten fantastische fotos maken door fotos in het programma te bewerken en te ordenen. A big deal about Lightroom has been that its edits are "non-destructive," that the original file is never touched, and the changes are kept discretely in a separate history folder away from the original. Verfijn je fotos met maximale controle en precisie wanneer je bewerkt met Lightroom voor desktop. I've been using PS for a long, long time, and something annoys me in the perception of PS vs LR - destructive vs non-destructive editing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |